site: copy edit — 2 pieces tightened (1 prose, 1 factual reconciliation)

daily-finds.log.md

@@ -4832,3 +4832,24 @@ Amazon: n-a (an open-source project).
 - **yamanote-3d** was the strongest find of the run on the merits and was held for one reason: **it has no hero and there is no path to one.** Three sources were checked at capture (og image, Product Hunt, the launches mirror) and all three yield a wordmark poster or a 180×180 thumbnail; the project is WebGL, so no static frame of the carriage exists anywhere. A review is a hero-led format, and a heroless review of a *visual* subject sells it worse than the find does. It stays a find, and it is the strongest argument yet for the standing browser-toy hero problem needing an operator decision.
 - **wavelength-light-app** clears the bar and was held on evidence: the claims are physiological (melanopic lux, circadian phase shifting) and checking them properly means more than reading the developer's own page, which is all that was reachable this run.
 - **the-minds-i** would make a good review and it would be a review of a 1981 book, not of a find — the honest version needs the book read, not summarised from a Book Freak entry.
+
+## 2026-08-02 — copy edit
+
+Fresh-eyes sonnet subagent over all 15 pieces of prose written this run (10 find bodies, 2 bundle blurb-plus-intro pairs, 3 review bodies). **One prose change, and one escalation that turned out to be the more valuable half of the pass.**
+
+The prose edit, accepted:
+- `kawran-bazar` (find) — subtitle read "vendors who clear the train tracks every time a train comes"; now "vendors who clear the tracks every time a train comes." A word-level repetition three words apart that neither author nor conductor had seen, and the sentence loses nothing.
+
+**The escalation, resolved in the main session because it was a factual call:**
+
+The find opened "By one count fifty-seven percent of Dhaka's vegetables move through this one market" while the review, published the same hour, spends a paragraph explaining that this exact figure is unsupported. Two adjacent pages arguing with each other, and the find was on the wrong side of it — "by one count" is a hedge thin enough that the sentence still reads as the site asserting the number. The find now opens on a documented figure instead: **"Nearly 1,800 permanent shops"** (DNCC's 2024 count of 1,789 permanent plus 180 temporary), which is verifiable, concrete, and does the same job of conveying scale. 72 → 62 words. The 57 percent claim now appears exactly once on the site, in the review, labelled as unverified — which is where a disputed number belongs.
+
+The subagent's reasoning for escalating rather than fixing was correct: whether to hedge a number, replace it or drop it is an editorial-fact decision, not a wording one.
+
+**Spot-check honoured rather than skipped**, per the standing 07-25 instruction. The subagent reported measuring rather than estimating and gave per-file counts; four were re-counted by hand in the main session — `kawran-bazar` find (72 before the fix, 62 after), `the-minds-i` (72), the `elevators` review (438) and the `cycloidal-gearbox` review (424) — and all four matched its figures. Every find body lands in 46–72 against the 40–90 budget; the three reviews at 430 / 438 / 424 against 250–450, none of them reaching for the narrative extension the charter allows the travel piece.
+
+Two non-findings recorded so they are not re-litigated:
+- The `elevators` review was already trimmed from 476 to 431 words during the review stage, before the copy editor saw it. It measured 438 (the difference is the lead blockquote, which the review-stage count excluded). Both are inside budget; the counting convention is worth fixing in the brief eventually, not today.
+- The subagent flagged and then deliberately kept the repeated "nothing" in the open-a-tab bundle description and the repeated "translator" in `onion-minions-epic-poem`, judging both to be rhetorical rather than sloppy. Agreed on both — the Onion find's whole joke is the word "translator" appearing twice with two different meanings.
+
+Format exception recorded again so it is not re-litigated: `joke-ground-beef` is 11 words against a 40–90 budget. The joke-find format is the setup and the punchline and nothing else, as with `joke-two-eyes` (14) on 08-01 and `joke-broken-pizza` on 07-29.