initial: four-collection content pipeline for unique.rzen.dev

A small Astro + MDX blog for delightful, daily-use finds. The architecture
separates capture from publication and supports reuse:

- find/    captured items, hidden from indexes
- finds/   editorial superposts referencing find slugs in a grid
- reviews/ full-length writeups; can graduate from a find via fromFind
- posts/   regular essays

Three project-local skills under .claude/skills/ drive the pipeline:
daily-finds (capture-only sweep across sources.json), build-finds (draft
a thematic superpost), build-review (graduate a find).

sources.json carries 47 curated feeds with per-source fetch strategy
(webfetch / curl / skip) so Cloudflare-blocked sites and Reddit JSON
endpoints are handled deterministically. /sources renders a 3-column
card stream with a "Recent finds" cross-reference per source.

Seeds: 17 reviews and one superpost referencing 5 finds.
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-03 11:48:03 -04:00
commit 9858abedc2
95 changed files with 10230 additions and 0 deletions
+98
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
---
name: build-finds
description: Draft a 'finds' superpost (editorial roundup) for unique.rzen.dev. Selects find items from src/content/find/, groups them under a theme, and writes a new file at src/content/finds/. Use when the user runs /build-finds, asks to "draft today's finds post", "build a roundup", or "make a catch".
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# build-finds
Author one editorial superpost (collection: `finds`) that references existing find items. Each superpost has a theme, a short blurb, and an `items` array listing find slugs. The grid layout is rendered by the page template — this skill only writes the MDX.
Invoke from inside the `unique.rzen.dev` repo.
## Inputs
- `src/content/find/*.mdx` — the available pool of finds.
- `src/content/finds/*.mdx` — existing superposts (used to detect already-referenced finds).
- Optional argument: a theme phrase (e.g. "single-virtue tools", "things-disguised-as-other-things").
- Optional argument: an explicit list of find slugs the user wants in the post.
## Procedure
### 1. Determine candidate pool
- If the user provided explicit slugs: use those.
- If the user provided a theme phrase only: scan all finds, surface the 812 that best fit the theme.
- If neither: scan recent (last ~14 days) finds that are **not yet referenced** by any existing superpost (read every `items[]` array; subtract). From the unreferenced pool, propose 13 thematic clusters of 510 finds each, with a candidate theme phrase per cluster.
Re-use is allowed — a find can appear in multiple superposts under different themes. But by default, prefer surfacing **unreferenced** finds first; only reach for re-uses when the theme genuinely calls for them.
### 2. Confirm the cluster
If proposing clusters, show the user:
```
Cluster A — "<theme phrase>"
- <slug>: <name>
- <slug>: <name>
- ...
Cluster B — "<theme phrase>"
...
```
Wait for the user to pick a cluster (or refine). Don't write anything until confirmed.
### 3. Write the superpost
File: `src/content/finds/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<theme-slug>.mdx` (theme-slug = kebab-case of the theme phrase, lowercase, ~30 chars max).
Frontmatter:
```yaml
---
title: "<Theme phrased as a noun phrase, max ~60 chars>"
date: YYYY-MM-DD
tags: [daily-finds, <topic-tag-1>, <topic-tag-2>]
description: "<One-line description for meta tags. Reuse the title if nothing better.>"
blurb: "<One short editorial sentence; appears as the post's secondary line in the home feed.>"
items:
- <slug>
- <slug>
- ...
---
```
Body: a brief audience-facing intro paragraph (12 sentences max) — open with "Today's catch" or a close variant; name what links these finds; vary the wording day to day. **No** numbered candidates, no headings inside the body, no list items — the grid renders from `items[]`.
Example body:
```mdx
> Today's catch from a morning sweep across the daily feeds. Five small things, each one built around exactly one virtue — a single sound, a single diagnostic, a single disguise, a single object made, a single quiet joke.
```
### 4. Verify
- Confirm every slug in `items[]` exists at `src/content/find/<slug>.mdx`. If any is missing, abort and report — never reference a non-existent find.
- Run `npm run build` to confirm the new superpost compiles.
### 5. Update the log
Append to `daily-finds.log.md`:
```
## YYYY-MM-DD — superpost: <theme>
Slug: <date>-<theme-slug>
Items referenced:
- <slug>
- <slug>
...
```
## Notes
- Default to 5 finds per superpost. Use 3 for tighter themes, up to 8 if the theme really supports it. Beyond 8 the grid stops being scannable.
- The body is for the audience, not the user. Never write "pick one", "candidates", "today's pick" — those are internal terms.
- Never edit existing find files when building a superpost. The find body and metadata are stable; the superpost only references them.
- If a find that's referenced has been graduated to a review (its frontmatter has `promotedTo`), it can still appear in the superpost — the grid card simply links to the find page, which itself links forward to the review.
+97
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
---
name: build-review
description: Graduate a find item to a full review for unique.rzen.dev. Reads src/content/find/<slug>.mdx, expands the body into a full review, writes src/content/reviews/<slug>.mdx, and links the two via fromFind / promotedTo. Use when the user runs /build-review <slug>, says "review this find", or "graduate <slug>".
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# build-review
Convert one captured `find` into a full `review`. Both records persist — the find stays put as the historical capture, the review becomes the canonical long-form treatment, and the two link to each other.
Invoke from inside the `unique.rzen.dev` repo with a find slug as the argument.
## Inputs
- `src/content/find/<slug>.mdx` — the source find (must exist; abort otherwise).
- `src/content/reviews/<slug>.mdx` — must NOT exist (abort if a review with the same slug is already there; ask the user to disambiguate).
## Procedure
### 1. Read the find
Parse frontmatter. Note: `name`, `subtitle`, `link`, `linkText`, `source`, `topics`, `tags`, plus the body.
If `promotedTo` is already set, abort: "This find has already been promoted to <slug>."
### 2. Suggest a hero asset
Look at the external link and propose a hero asset — a screenshot, demo gif, or product photo from the maker's site.
- Mac apps: an App Store screenshot or hero image from the developer's site.
- Physical products: the maker's product photo.
- Travel destinations: a Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons photo (free-to-use only).
Tell the user what you'd download and where to place it (`src/assets/reviews/<slug>/hero.<ext>` or similar). Pause for approval before downloading.
### 3. Expand the body
Take the find's 2-3 sentence body and expand it to a full review:
- Lead with a `>` blockquote summary (1-2 sentences) — this renders as the accent-bordered lead per the existing review style.
- 3-5 paragraphs covering: what it is, the specific problem it solves, the concrete details that make it earn its place, and any honest limitations.
- Reference the hero asset inline if downloaded (`![alt](../../assets/reviews/<slug>/hero.png)`).
- Don't pad. If the find body is already complete, the review is just it + a blockquote summary + maybe one paragraph on context.
- Match the voice of existing reviews under `src/content/reviews/` — informative, concise, no sales tone.
### 4. Write the review
File: `src/content/reviews/<slug>.mdx`.
Frontmatter:
```yaml
---
name: "<from the find>"
subtitle: "<from the find — required for reviews>"
date: YYYY-MM-DD # today (the review date), not the find's date
category: <pick from existing categories or propose a new one>
tags: <merge the find's tags with any review-specific additions>
link: "<from the find>"
linkText: "<from the find, if set>"
description: "<short meta description>"
source: "<from the find>"
fromFind: "<find slug>"
---
```
If the find had no `subtitle`, generate one — it's required on reviews.
### 5. Update the find
Edit `src/content/find/<slug>.mdx` frontmatter: add `promotedTo: <review-slug>`.
(Slug usually matches the find's slug, so `promotedTo` and the find's filename match.)
### 6. Verify
- Run `npm run build`. Confirm:
- `/reviews/<slug>/` exists, shows the source badge and "← First surfaced…" backlink to the find page.
- `/find/<slug>/` shows the "→ Read the full review" callout pointing to the review.
- Any superpost that references the find still renders fine; the find card on the grid remains.
### 7. Update the log
Append to `daily-finds.log.md`:
```
## YYYY-MM-DD — review: <slug>
Graduated from find captured on <find-date>, source: <source>.
```
## Notes
- The find's slug and the review's slug should match. Same slug = same item across the pipeline; cross-references stay simple.
- Don't move or delete the find. Both records persist. The find is the historical capture; the review is the long-form treatment.
- Never auto-write a review without showing the user the proposed body first. This is editorial work; the skill's job is to draft, not to publish unilaterally.
- If multiple finds describe the same underlying thing, the user should consolidate them manually before running this skill.
+106
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
---
name: daily-finds
description: Capture-only daily sweep for unique.rzen.dev. Scans every source in sources.json, writes one find file per qualifying item to src/content/find/, and nominates 1-2 new sources to consider. Does NOT pick a winner, write a superpost, or address the user/audience. Picking happens via /build-finds and /build-review. Use when the user asks for "today's finds", "morning sweep", "capture", or runs /daily-finds.
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# daily-finds
Pure capture: every item that passes the bar becomes a `find` file. No daily cap, no theme detection, no audience-facing post. Whether any of these finds appears in a `finds` superpost or graduates to a review is a separate editorial decision.
Invoke from inside the `unique.rzen.dev` repo.
## Inputs
- `sources.json` at the project root — curated source list with per-source `fetch` strategy (`webfetch` / `curl` / `skip`) and optional `fetchUrl`.
- `daily-finds.log.md` — running log of every find slug ever written (used to skip duplicates).
- `src/content/find/*.mdx` — already-captured finds (every existing slug is a "do not re-suggest" item).
- `src/content/reviews/*.mdx` — already-reviewed items (do not re-suggest).
- `candidate-sources.md` — newly nominated sources awaiting user vetting.
## The bar
A find qualifies if and only if it is **(a)** delightful, unusual, or distinctive in a way the audience would care about *and* **(b)** usable daily (relax to "memorable for a visitor" for travel). Drop generic mass-market items, ad-copy listicles, speculative / not-yet-shipping products, self-promo, and anything not traceable to a real currently-buyable / currently-visitable thing.
Crucially: do **not** filter by "is it the best of the day." Capture broadly. Editorial selection happens later.
## Procedure
### 1. Scan every source
For each source in `sources.json`:
- **Default (`fetch: "webfetch"` or no field)**: WebFetch against `fetchUrl` if present, else `url`. Extract recently-featured items (name, link, one-line description).
- **`fetch: "curl"`**: shell out to `curl -sL -A "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.0 Safari/605.1.15" --max-time 25 "<fetchUrl|url>"` and parse the HTML body. For Reddit JSON endpoints, pipe through `python3 -c '…'` to extract titles, links, and selftext. Treat HTTP 403 with a non-empty HTML body as a content response (Atlas Obscura quirk) — only treat empty bodies or Cloudflare challenge markers as blocked.
- **`fetch: "skip"`**: log the source as skipped (with `skipReason`) and move on. Do not retry.
Parallelize WebFetch in batches of ~8 concurrent requests; finish all sources before proceeding.
For each source record: items extracted, or `empty` / `blocked` / `skipped`.
### 2. Filter
For each extracted item, drop:
- Anything whose slug already exists in `src/content/find/`.
- Anything whose name appears anywhere in `daily-finds.log.md`.
- Anything reviewed in `src/content/reviews/` (compare by `name` field).
- Items that fail the bar above.
### 3. Write find files
For every survivor, write one file at `src/content/find/<slug>.mdx`:
- Slug: kebab-case form of the name (lowercase, ASCII, no leading numbers).
- Frontmatter: `name`, `subtitle` (optional, one-liner), `date` (today), `link` (external URL — required), `linkText` (optional), `source` (the source name from sources.json — required, exact match), `topics` (copied from the source's `topics`), `tags` (free editorial tags inferred from the item — keep to 2-4), `description` (optional meta override).
- Body: 2-3 sentence note. Concrete, name a *specific* virtue. Bad: "great design". Good: "the silicone bumper means it survives drops onto concrete; the lanyard hole is positioned where your thumb naturally rests".
- No daily cap — write every survivor.
If `link` for a Reddit-discovered item points at a v.redd.it / i.redd.it URL, fetch the post's selftext or comments to find the actual product URL before writing the file.
### 4. Nominate 12 new sources
Spend a small slice of the run on source discovery:
- During scans, when another publication / blog / shop / newsletter is referenced in a way that suggests it'd fit the brief, capture it.
- Or run one targeted `WebSearch` for `"best <topic> newsletter"` or `"<topic> curator blog"`.
- Append nominees to `candidate-sources.md` (create if missing) under today's date heading. For each: name, URL, a one-line case for adding, and which existing source surfaced it (or "WebSearch").
- Don't auto-add to `sources.json` — that's a user decision.
### 5. Update the log
Append to `daily-finds.log.md`:
```
## YYYY-MM-DD — capture run
Sources scanned: <N> total — <hits> hits, <empty> empty, <blocked> blocked, <skipped> skipped.
Productive sources: <comma-separated list of sources that produced at least one written find>.
Captured finds:
- <slug> — <name> — source: <source>
- <slug> — <name> — source: <source>
- ...
New source nominees: <count> (see candidate-sources.md).
```
### 6. Report to the user
Short summary in chat:
```
Captured <N> finds across <M> productive sources today.
Blocked: <K> sources. New source nominees: <count>.
Run /build-finds to draft a superpost from the recent pool, or /build-review <slug> to graduate one to a review.
```
That's it. No theme, no candidates list, no "pick a winner."
## Notes
- "Why it fits" / find descriptions should name a *specific* virtue. Bad: "great design". Good: "magnetic connector means it never strains the cable when a foot catches it".
- Travel destinations relax the daily-use criterion — a place qualifies if a visitor would remember it years later.
- If a source's homepage is too noisy, prefer adding a `fetchUrl` to `sources.json` rather than working around it inside the skill.
- Never invent slugs that collide with existing finds or reviews. If a name would produce a colliding slug, append a year or distinguishing word.
- Source attribution must be exact — the `source` field in each find file must match a `name` in `sources.json` so the `/sources` page cross-reference works.