Disambiguates the one-letter `find` (item) vs `finds` (roundup) split that
kept causing confusion. Audience-facing now: `/bundles/<slug>/`, "Bundle"
labels in home/footer/search.
Internals: `getCollection('finds')` → `('bundles')`, `Entry.type 'finds'`
→ `'bundle'`, `OgFallback 'finds'` → `'bundles'`, `findListMosaic` →
`bundleMosaic`, `FindsPost` → `Bundle`, `findsReferencing` →
`bundlesReferencing`. Build script + generated mosaic dir follow
(`scripts/build-bundle-mosaics.mjs`, `src/generated/bundle-mosaics/`).
Skills `build-finds` → `build-bundle`, `cluster-finds` →
`cluster-bundles`. The `find` collection (individual items) is unchanged.
No URL redirects: low external-link surface area.
8.7 KiB
name, description, disable-model-invocation
| name | description | disable-model-invocation |
|---|---|---|
| daily-finds | Capture-only daily sweep for unique.rzen.dev. Scans every source in sources.json, writes one find file per qualifying item to src/content/find/, and nominates any new sources cited in the items it reads (plus optionally via WebSearch). Does NOT pick a winner, write a bundle, or address the user/audience. Picking happens via /build-bundle and /build-review. Use when the user asks for "today's finds", "morning sweep", "capture", or runs /daily-finds. | true |
daily-finds
Pure capture: every item that passes the bar becomes a find file. No daily cap, no theme detection, no audience-facing post. Whether any of these finds appears in a bundle or graduates to a review is a separate editorial decision.
Invoke from inside the unique.rzen.dev repo.
Inputs
sources.jsonat the project root — curated source list with per-sourcefetchstrategy (webfetch/curl/skip) and optionalfetchUrl.daily-finds.log.md— running log of every find slug ever written (used to skip duplicates).src/content/find/*.mdx— already-captured finds (every existing slug is a "do not re-suggest" item).src/content/reviews/*.mdx— already-reviewed items (do not re-suggest).candidate-sources.md— newly nominated sources awaiting user vetting.
The bar
A find qualifies if and only if it is (a) delightful, unusual, or distinctive in a way the audience would care about and (b) usable daily (relax to "memorable for a visitor" for travel). Drop generic mass-market items, ad-copy listicles, speculative / not-yet-shipping products, self-promo, and anything not traceable to a real currently-buyable / currently-visitable thing.
Crucially: do not filter by "is it the best of the day." Capture broadly. Editorial selection happens later.
Procedure
1. Scan every source
For each source in sources.json:
- Default (
fetch: "webfetch"or no field): WebFetch againstfetchUrlif present, elseurl. Extract recently-featured items (name, link, one-line description). fetch: "curl": shell out tocurl -sL -A "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/17.0 Safari/605.1.15" --max-time 25 "<fetchUrl|url>"and parse the HTML body. For Reddit JSON endpoints, pipe throughpython3 -c '…'to extract titles, links, and selftext. Treat HTTP 403 with a non-empty HTML body as a content response (Atlas Obscura quirk) — only treat empty bodies or Cloudflare challenge markers as blocked.fetch: "skip": log the source as skipped (withskipReason) and move on. Do not retry.
Parallelize WebFetch in batches of ~8 concurrent requests; finish all sources before proceeding.
For each source record: items extracted, or empty / blocked / skipped.
2. Filter
For each extracted item, drop:
- Anything whose slug already exists in
src/content/find/. - Anything whose name appears anywhere in
daily-finds.log.md. - Anything reviewed in
src/content/reviews/(compare bynamefield). - Items that fail the bar above.
3. Write find files
For every survivor, write one file at src/content/find/<slug>.mdx:
- Slug: kebab-case form of the name (lowercase, ASCII, no leading numbers).
- Frontmatter:
name,subtitle(optional, one-liner),date(today),link(external URL — required),linkText(optional),source(the source name from sources.json — required, exact match),topics(copied from the source'stopics),tags(free editorial tags inferred from the item — keep to 2-4),description(optional meta override). - Body: 2-3 sentence note. Concrete, name a specific virtue. Bad: "great design". Good: "the silicone bumper means it survives drops onto concrete; the lanyard hole is positioned where your thumb naturally rests".
- No daily cap — write every survivor.
If link for a Reddit-discovered item points at a v.redd.it / i.redd.it URL, fetch the post's selftext or comments to find the actual product URL before writing the file.
Supporting media
For every find, try to retrieve a single representative image from the linked page so the find has visual support if it later graduates to a review (or gets surfaced on a tile).
- Where to look (in priority order):
og:imagemeta tag → JSON-LDimagefield → main product photo / hero image markup → first article image. - Where to save:
src/assets/finds/<slug>/hero.<ext>. Preserve the original extension (.jpg,.png,.webp,.gif). One file per find —herois the canonical name. - What to skip: images with marketing/sales overlay text (Amazon-style "BEST PRESS / NO GRIT" tags), tiny thumbnails (<400px on the long edge), generic site logos, paywalled CDN URLs that 403 to curl. If the only available shots are marketing collages, skip rather than save a noisy image — a missing hero is fine, a bad one isn't.
- For Mac/iOS apps: prefer the App Store hero or developer-site screenshot. For physical products: prefer a clean studio shot or lifestyle photo without overlay copy. For travel destinations: prefer a Wikimedia Commons / Wikipedia image (free-to-use only). For text-only finds (quotes, dad jokes, essays): no media expected — skip.
- Fetch strategy:
curl -sL --max-time 25 -A "Mozilla/5.0 (...Safari...)" "<image-url>" -o <path>. WebFetch is for HTML, not binaries. - Don't register heroes in
src/lib/hero.tsat this stage. That's a review-time decision (seebuild-review). The asset just needs to exist on disk so it's there if/when the find graduates.
Log image-fetch failures (404, 403, marketing-only) as a one-line note in the capture-run section of daily-finds.log.md so we can revisit broken media-source patterns later — same way we log fetch issues for source pages.
4. Nominate new sources
Watch for new sources organically and via search. No cap on nominees per run — if a day's reading surfaces five plausible new sources, capture all five.
- From inline references in source posts. When a post on a known source credits or links out to another publication as where they originally discovered the thing, capture that publication as a candidate source. Trigger phrases to watch for: "via X", "first seen on Y", "spotted by Z", "h/t X", "originally posted on Y", "thanks to X for the find", or any byline / sidebar link pointing to a different domain that itself looks like a curated feed. Cool Tools, Tools and Toys, Recomendo, Kottke, and Daring Fireball especially tend to credit their finds — read posts carefully enough to catch these credits.
- From general observation. When a publication is mentioned in a way that suggests it'd fit the brief (curated, taste-driven, focused on delightful or unusual items), nominate it.
- From targeted search. If the run produced few or no organic candidates, run one
WebSearchfor"best <topic> newsletter"or"<topic> curator blog".
Append every nominee to candidate-sources.md under today's date heading. For each: name, URL, a one-line case for adding, and how it was surfaced — name the originating source post when applicable (e.g. "via a Cool Tools post about the Spyderco Dragonfly"), or "WebSearch" for search-derived candidates.
Don't auto-add to sources.json — that's a user decision.
5. Update the log
Append to daily-finds.log.md:
## YYYY-MM-DD — capture run
Sources scanned: <N> total — <hits> hits, <empty> empty, <blocked> blocked, <skipped> skipped.
Productive sources: <comma-separated list of sources that produced at least one written find>.
Captured finds:
- <slug> — <name> — source: <source>
- <slug> — <name> — source: <source>
- ...
New source nominees: <count> (see candidate-sources.md).
6. Report to the user
Short summary in chat:
Captured <N> finds across <M> productive sources today.
Blocked: <K> sources. New source nominees: <count>.
Run /build-bundle to draft a bundle from the recent pool, or /build-review <slug> to graduate one to a review.
That's it. No theme, no candidates list, no "pick a winner."
Notes
- "Why it fits" / find descriptions should name a specific virtue. Bad: "great design". Good: "magnetic connector means it never strains the cable when a foot catches it".
- Travel destinations relax the daily-use criterion — a place qualifies if a visitor would remember it years later.
- If a source's homepage is too noisy, prefer adding a
fetchUrltosources.jsonrather than working around it inside the skill. - Never invent slugs that collide with existing finds or reviews. If a name would produce a colliding slug, append a year or distinguishing word.
- Source attribution must be exact — the
sourcefield in each find file must match anameinsources.jsonso the/sourcespage cross-reference works.